
In Class Exercise 2:
The origins of chloroplasts and mitochondria in eukaryotic cells
What hypothesis would you suggest about the origin of
organelles after reading the following pieces of information?
With a partner or group, get together and discuss the
evidence above, and think of a hypothesis that might best explain the evidence
above. There may be more that one way the evidence could be explained
Hypothesis: mitochondria and chloroplasts came about in eukaryotic cells when.....
The Endosymbiotic Theory ... first postulated by Lynn Margulis in the 1970s.
Simply stated, the Endosymbiotic Theory postulates that mitochondria and chloroplasts are the result of endocytosis ("within cells") of bacteria and blue-green (photosynthetic) bacteria by anaerobic bacteria, which became mutually beneficial for both cells (symbiotic). Endocytosis + symbiosis = endosymbiotic = "living together - within cells"
The appearance of eukaryotic cells with double membrane-bound organelles appear for the first time in the fossil record right about the time the atmosphere on Earth changed from an anaerobic (no oxygen) environment to an aerobic (oxygen-containing) environment.
Her original hypothesis proposed that aerobic bacteria (that require oxygen) were ingested by anaerobic bacteria (poisoned by oxygen) each would have performed mutually benefiting functions from their symbiotic relationship as the waters and atmosphere of the Precambrian changed. The aerobic bacteria would have "breathed" for the anareobic bacteria, and the anaerobic bacteria would have navigated through new oxygen-rich waters and ingested food.
Although now widely accepted as a valid Scientific Theory
("way up there" on the scale of certainty), both Dr. Margulis
and her hypothesis were scoffed at for a number of years. Thanks to over
30 years of additional evidence, The Endosymbiotic Theory provides the most
plausible explanation for the development of organelles within the eukaryotic
cell.